GPT-5.2 o1 vs DALL-E 3

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.

Winner
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Thinking

4.9
Try GPT-5.2 o1
OpenAI

DALL-E 3

4.7
Try DALL-E 3
Our Pick
GPT-5.2 Thinking

GPT-5.2 Thinking edges out DALL-E 3 with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.

Try GPT-5.2 o1

Feature Comparison

Feature
GPT-5.2 o1
DALL-E 3
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.9
4.7
Coding
4.8
-
Writing
4.5
-
Reasoning
5.0
-
Speed
3.8
4.3
Value
4.0
4.4
Pricing
Monthly Price
$200
$20
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
$15
-
Output (per 1M tokens)
$60
-
Features
Context Window
128K
-
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

GPT-5.2 Thinking

Pros

  • Best reasoning model from OpenAI
  • Edges out Gemini 3 and Claude Opus 4.5 on most tests
  • Performs at/above human expert level on GDPval
  • Excellent for coding, math, and document analysis
  • State-of-the-art on SWE-Bench Pro

Cons

  • Expensive ($200/mo for Pro subscription)
  • Slower than Instant variant
  • Requires Pro subscription for full access
  • Writing can feel robotic

DALL-E 3

Pros

  • Best text rendering in images
  • Integrated into ChatGPT
  • High quality outputs
  • Follows complex prompts well
  • Safety features built-in

Cons

  • No editing/inpainting
  • Requires ChatGPT Plus
  • Limited style control
  • Slower than some alternatives

Choose GPT-5.2 o1 if you need:

Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs

Choose DALL-E 3 if you need:

Marketing images, images with text, integrated chat workflow

Ready to get started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.