DALL-E 3 vs Opus 4.5

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.

OpenAI

DALL-E 3

4.7
Try DALL-E 3
Winner
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

4.9
Try Opus 4.5
Our Pick
Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 edges out DALL-E 3 with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.

Try Opus 4.5

Feature Comparison

Feature
DALL-E 3
Opus 4.5
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.7
4.9
Coding
-
5.0
Writing
-
4.8
Reasoning
-
4.9
Speed
4.3
4.2
Value
4.4
4.5
Pricing
Monthly Price
$20
$20
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
-
$5
Output (per 1M tokens)
-
$25
Features
Context Window
-
200K
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

DALL-E 3

Pros

  • Best text rendering in images
  • Integrated into ChatGPT
  • High quality outputs
  • Follows complex prompts well
  • Safety features built-in

Cons

  • No editing/inpainting
  • Requires ChatGPT Plus
  • Limited style control
  • Slower than some alternatives

Claude Opus 4.5

Pros

  • Best coding model available (80.9% SWE-bench)
  • Excellent for autonomous agents
  • Effort parameter allows speed/quality tradeoff
  • 76% fewer tokens than Sonnet at same quality
  • Strong at long-horizon tasks

Cons

  • More expensive than Sonnet
  • Slower on simple tasks
  • Requires Claude Pro/Max subscription for full access

Choose DALL-E 3 if you need:

Marketing images, images with text, integrated chat workflow

Choose Opus 4.5 if you need:

Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents

Ready to get started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.