GPT-5.2 o1 vs Gemini 3
A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.
Our Pick
GPT-5.2 Thinking
GPT-5.2 Thinking edges out Gemini 3 Pro with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.
Try GPT-5.2 o1Feature Comparison
Feature
GPT-5.2 o1
Gemini 3
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.9
4.8
Coding
4.8
4.7
Writing
4.5
4.5
Reasoning
5.0
4.8
Speed
3.8
4.7
Value
4.0
5.0
Pricing
Monthly Price
$200
$20
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
$15
$1.25
Output (per 1M tokens)
$60
$5
Features
Context Window
128K
1049K
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents
GPT-5.2 Thinking
Pros
- Best reasoning model from OpenAI
- Edges out Gemini 3 and Claude Opus 4.5 on most tests
- Performs at/above human expert level on GDPval
- Excellent for coding, math, and document analysis
- State-of-the-art on SWE-Bench Pro
Cons
- Expensive ($200/mo for Pro subscription)
- Slower than Instant variant
- Requires Pro subscription for full access
- Writing can feel robotic
Gemini 3 Pro
Pros
- Best value - cheapest premium model
- Massive 1M+ token context
- First model to hit 1500 Elo
- True multimodal (video, audio, text, images)
- Excellent for large codebases
Cons
- Writing style less polished than Claude
- Google ecosystem integration can be limiting
- Deep Think mode limited to Ultra subscribers
Choose GPT-5.2 o1 if you need:
Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs
Choose Gemini 3 if you need:
Large projects, budget-conscious users, multimodal tasks
Ready to get started?
Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.