DALL-E 3 vs GPT-5.2 o1
A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.
Our Pick
GPT-5.2 Thinking
GPT-5.2 Thinking edges out DALL-E 3 with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.
Try GPT-5.2 o1Feature Comparison
Feature
DALL-E 3
GPT-5.2 o1
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.7
4.9
Coding
-
4.8
Writing
-
4.5
Reasoning
-
5.0
Speed
4.3
3.8
Value
4.4
4.0
Pricing
Monthly Price
$20
$200
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
-
$15
Output (per 1M tokens)
-
$60
Features
Context Window
-
128K
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents
DALL-E 3
Pros
- Best text rendering in images
- Integrated into ChatGPT
- High quality outputs
- Follows complex prompts well
- Safety features built-in
Cons
- No editing/inpainting
- Requires ChatGPT Plus
- Limited style control
- Slower than some alternatives
GPT-5.2 Thinking
Pros
- Best reasoning model from OpenAI
- Edges out Gemini 3 and Claude Opus 4.5 on most tests
- Performs at/above human expert level on GDPval
- Excellent for coding, math, and document analysis
- State-of-the-art on SWE-Bench Pro
Cons
- Expensive ($200/mo for Pro subscription)
- Slower than Instant variant
- Requires Pro subscription for full access
- Writing can feel robotic
Choose DALL-E 3 if you need:
Marketing images, images with text, integrated chat workflow
Choose GPT-5.2 o1 if you need:
Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs
Ready to get started?
Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.