Cursor vs GPT-5.2 o1
A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.
Our Pick
GPT-5.2 Thinking
GPT-5.2 Thinking edges out Cursor with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.
Try GPT-5.2 o1Feature Comparison
Feature
Cursor
GPT-5.2 o1
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.7
4.9
Coding
4.8
4.8
Writing
-
4.5
Reasoning
4.5
5.0
Speed
4.6
3.8
Value
4.7
4.0
Pricing
Monthly Price
$20
$200
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
-
$15
Output (per 1M tokens)
-
$60
Features
Context Window
200K
128K
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents
Cursor
Pros
- Best IDE experience for AI coding
- Understands project context deeply
- Multi-file editing
- Tab completion is excellent
- Uses latest Claude/GPT models
Cons
- Limited to coding only
- Premium features require subscription
- Can be resource-intensive
GPT-5.2 Thinking
Pros
- Best reasoning model from OpenAI
- Edges out Gemini 3 and Claude Opus 4.5 on most tests
- Performs at/above human expert level on GDPval
- Excellent for coding, math, and document analysis
- State-of-the-art on SWE-Bench Pro
Cons
- Expensive ($200/mo for Pro subscription)
- Slower than Instant variant
- Requires Pro subscription for full access
- Writing can feel robotic
Choose Cursor if you need:
Daily coding, large projects, professional developers
Choose GPT-5.2 o1 if you need:
Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs
Ready to get started?
Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.