Updated January 2026

ChatGPT vs Opus 4.5

A comprehensive 2026 comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs. We tested both extensively.

OpenAI

ChatGPT

4.7
Try ChatGPT Free
Winner
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

4.9
Try Opus 4.5 Free

Quick Verdict: ChatGPT vs Opus 4.5

After extensive testing, **Claude Opus 4.5** comes out ahead with a 4.9/5 rating. It's the better choice for most users, especially those focused on Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents. However, ChatGPT remains competitive and may be preferable if you prioritize General assistance, creative tasks, everyday use.

Our Pick for 2026
Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 edges out ChatGPT with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users in 2026. With a 4.9/5 rating, it excels particularly in Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents.

Try Opus 4.5 Free

Feature Comparison Table

Side-by-side comparison of key features and capabilities

Feature
ChatGPT
Opus 4.5
Performance Ratings
Overall Rating
4.7
4.9
Coding
4.5
5.0
Writing
4.6
4.8
Reasoning
4.5
4.9
Speed
4.7
4.2
Value for Money
4.5
4.5
Pricing
Monthly Price
$20
$20
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
-
$5
Output (per 1M tokens)
-
$25
Capabilities
Context Window
128K
200K
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

When to Use ChatGPT vs Opus 4.5

Choose ChatGPT When You Need:

  • General assistance, creative tasks, everyday use
  • Faster response times for time-sensitive work
  • Testing capabilities with a free tier before committing

Choose Opus 4.5 When You Need:

  • Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents
  • Superior coding assistance and code generation
  • Better quality content writing and creative tasks
  • Processing longer documents with 200K context

In-Depth Analysis: ChatGPT vs Opus 4.5

Performance & Capabilities

In our comprehensive testing for 2026, we evaluated both ChatGPT and Claude Opus 4.5 across multiple dimensions including coding tasks, creative writing, reasoning problems, and general conversation quality. Claude Opus 4.5 emerged as our top pick with an overall rating of 4.9/5.

ChatGPT scored 4.5/5 on coding tasks, making it an excellent choice for developers. In comparison, Claude Opus 4.5 achieved 5.0/5 in this category.

Pricing & Value

When it comes to pricing, ChatGPT has an advantage with its free tier. For paid plans, Claude Opus 4.5 is more affordable at $20/month compared to $20/month.

Use Cases & Target Audience

ChatGPT is particularly well-suited for General assistance, creative tasks, everyday use. Its strengths make it ideal for professionals who need advanced coding help, quality content creation, and reliable AI assistance.

Claude Opus 4.5, on the other hand, excels at Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents. Users who prioritize fast response times, complex reasoning, will find it particularly valuable.

ChatGPT Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Largest user base and ecosystem
  • Memory for personalization
  • DALL-E 3 integration
  • Voice mode available
  • Free tier available

Cons

  • Rate limits on free tier
  • Less specialized than Claude for coding

Claude Opus 4.5 Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Best coding model available (80.9% SWE-bench)
  • Excellent for autonomous agents
  • Effort parameter allows speed/quality tradeoff
  • 76% fewer tokens than Sonnet at same quality
  • Strong at long-horizon tasks

Cons

  • More expensive than Sonnet
  • Slower on simple tasks
  • Requires Claude Pro/Max subscription for full access

Best For: ChatGPT

General assistance, creative tasks, everyday use

Best For: Opus 4.5

Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ChatGPT vs Opus 4.5

Is ChatGPT better than Claude Opus 4.5 in 2026?

Based on our benchmarks and analysis, Claude Opus 4.5 performs better overall with a rating of 4.9/5. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - ChatGPT excels at General assistance, creative tasks, everyday use, while Claude Opus 4.5 is better for Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents.

What is the price difference between ChatGPT and Opus 4.5?

ChatGPT offers a free tier and costs $20/month for paid plans. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $20/month for paid plans.

Which is better for coding: ChatGPT or Opus 4.5?

For coding tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher with a 5.0/5 coding rating compared to 4.5/5.

Can I use ChatGPT and Opus 4.5 for free?

ChatGPT does offer a free tier with limited features. Claude Opus 4.5 requires a paid subscription. Both tools offer trial periods or limited free access for new users.

Which AI has a larger context window: ChatGPT or Opus 4.5?

Claude Opus 4.5 has a larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens. Larger context windows allow processing more text in a single conversation.

Is ChatGPT faster than Opus 4.5?

In our speed tests, ChatGPT is faster with a speed rating of 4.7/5. Response times can vary based on server load and query complexity.

Which is better for writing content: ChatGPT or Opus 4.5?

For content writing, Claude Opus 4.5 excels with a writing rating of 4.8/5 versus 4.6/5. Consider your specific writing needs when choosing.

Do ChatGPT and Opus 4.5 support image generation?

ChatGPT supports image understanding and analysis. Claude Opus 4.5 supports image understanding and analysis. For dedicated image generation, consider specialized tools like DALL-E or Midjourney.

Which AI should beginners choose: ChatGPT or Opus 4.5?

For beginners, we recommend ChatGPT since it offers a free tier. Claude Opus 4.5 has a slightly better overall user experience based on our testing.

Can I switch from ChatGPT to Opus 4.5 easily?

Yes, switching between AI tools is straightforward since they use similar prompting interfaces. Your conversation history won't transfer, but you can export important outputs. Many professionals use both tools depending on the task - ChatGPT for General assistance, creative tasks, everyday use and Claude Opus 4.5 for Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents.

Ready to Get Started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow in 2026.