Amazon Q vs Opus 4.5

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.

Amazon Web Services

Amazon Q Developer

4.5
Try Amazon Q
Winner
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

4.9
Try Opus 4.5
Our Pick
Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 edges out Amazon Q Developer with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.

Try Opus 4.5

Feature Comparison

Feature
Amazon Q
Opus 4.5
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.5
4.9
Coding
4.6
5.0
Writing
4.0
4.8
Reasoning
4.4
4.9
Speed
4.5
4.2
Value
4.7
4.5
Pricing
Monthly Price
$19
$20
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
-
$5
Output (per 1M tokens)
-
$25
Features
Context Window
200K
200K
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

Amazon Q Developer

Pros

  • Best-in-class AWS integration
  • 66% on SWE-Bench Verified
  • Code transformation (Java 8 to 17)
  • Built-in security scanning
  • Generous free tier

Cons

  • AWS-focused, less general-purpose
  • Learning curve for non-AWS users

Claude Opus 4.5

Pros

  • Best coding model available (80.9% SWE-bench)
  • Excellent for autonomous agents
  • Effort parameter allows speed/quality tradeoff
  • 76% fewer tokens than Sonnet at same quality
  • Strong at long-horizon tasks

Cons

  • More expensive than Sonnet
  • Slower on simple tasks
  • Requires Claude Pro/Max subscription for full access

Choose Amazon Q if you need:

AWS developers, cloud migrations, code modernization

Choose Opus 4.5 if you need:

Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents

Ready to get started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.